Skip to main content
· 6/18/1913

Mingos v. Central Railroad

Citations

  • 84 N.J.L. 677
  • 55 Vroom 677
  • 87 A. 106
  • 1913 N.J. LEXIS 218

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[W]here the fines and penalties arise solely from the postpetition failure to remediate prepetition contamination, the fines and penalties do not qualify for administrative expense priority in any respect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Swayze

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.