Ming Ming Wijono v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that anti-Chinese statements made during attacks against the petitioner were \insufficient to establish a nexus between the attacks and a protected ground\
• holding that racist statements made by attackers during a robbery were alone “insufficient to establish a nexus between the attacks and a protected ground”
• concluding that the denial of asylum and withholding of removal dictates the same outcome on a CAT claim when the claims are based on the same underlying facts
• concluding that the denial of asylum and withholding of removal dictates the same outcome on a CAT claim when the claims are based on the same underlying facts
• concluding that the denial of asylum and withholding of removal dictates the same outcome on a CAT claim when the claims are based on the same underlying facts
• holding that this Court’s consideration of a due process argument based on an IJ’s processing of an asylum claim was precluded by the alien’s failure to raise the claim to the Board of Immigration Appeals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).