Skip to main content
· 5/20/2010

Miness v. Ahuja

Citations

  • 713 F. Supp. 2d 161
  • 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50535
  • 2010 WL 2025193

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ordering the parties to appear for an evidentiary hearing “[g]iven the divergence in [their] description of the relevant events,” and noting that the disqualification motion “rests of [sic] issues of disputed fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spatt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.