Mines v. Metagenics, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that accounting firm did not violate RICO when it prepared audits in reliance upon a client’s existing records
• holding that, in order to plead adequate RICO complaint, plaintiff must allege that defendant had some part in the direction of the alleged enterprise's affairs
• holding that a substantive RICO conviction requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant participated in the operation or management of the enterprise itself
• holding that, to be criminally responsible under 18 U.S.C.A. § 1962(c), a defendant must “participate in the operation or management of the enterprise itself’
• holding that unambiguous language is conclusive unless “a clearly expressed legislative intent to the contrary” exists
• holding that, in order to plead adequate RICO complaint, plaintiff must allege that defendant had some part in the direction of the alleged enterprise’s affairs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).