Skip to main content
· 11/16/1945

Miners Sav. Bank of Pittston v. United States

Citations

  • 63 F. Supp. 305
  • 1945 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1688

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding protected activity when employees gave photograph of ongoing violation to supervisor
  • “A retaliatory firing based upon an employee’s filing of a claim of discrimination in the workplace clearly violates public policy and could support a wrongful discharge claim.”
  • “A retaliatory firing based upon an employee’s filing of a claim of discrimination in the workplace clearly violates public policy and could support a wrongful discharge claim.”
  • \A retaliatory firing based upon an employee's filing of a claim of discrimination in the workplace clearly violates public policy and could support a wrongful discharge claim.\ (emphasis added)
  • “‘[A] document attached to the moving party’s pleading may not be considered in connection with a Rule 12(c) motion unless the non-moving party has made admissions regarding the document.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Watson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.