Miners, Inc. v. Alpine Equipment Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that no identity of ownership existed where, although 60% of each of two corporations shared common ownership, the remaining 40% of each did not
• reasoning that although piercing the corporate veil under the single entity theory would make another corporation liable, piercing under the alter ego theory would render the entity’s stockholders personally liable for the corporation’s debts
• “the enterprise entity theory or the single entity theory . . . , however, has yet to be adopted in Pennsylvania”
• explaining alter-ego theory of liability for piercing the corporate veil

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).