· 11/20/1992
Miner v. Farm Bur. Mut. Ins. Co., Inc.
Citations
- 841 P.2d 1093
- 17 Kan. App. 2d 598
- 1992 Kan. App. LEXIS 587
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[i]t [is] not a function of the trial court to create an ambiguity requiring an interpretation favorable to the insured when no ambiguity exist[s]”
- noting that “[i]t [is] not a function of the trial court to create an ambiguity requiring an interpretation favorable to the insured when no ambiguity exist[s]”
- noting that “[i]t [is] not a function of the trial court to create an ambiguity requiring an interpretation favorable to the insured when no ambiguity exist[s]”
- noting that “[i]t [is] not a function of the trial court to create an ambiguity requhv ing an interpretation favorable to the insured when no ambiguity existfs]”
- recognizing this duty even where a party cannot himself read
- recognizing this duty even where a party cannot himself read
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gernon, Davis, Wahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.