Miner v. Clinton County, NY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “that a District Court is required to examine whether a defendant’s belief was objectively reasonable under the circumstances.”
• nonmoving party must offer “some hard evidence showing that its version of the events is not wholly fanciful”
• rejecting a due-process claim because the notices were adequate and an equal-protection claim because no discrimination occurred
• rejecting a due-process claim because the notices were adequate and an equal-protection claim because no discrimination occurred
• “The fact that other counties may allow redemption after judgment is insufficient to sustain.[ ] equal protection [and due process] claim[s] against Clinton County.”
• letters sent by first class mail, having not been returned as undeliverable, are presumed to “have been delivered to the correct address”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).