Skip to main content
· 6/19/1975

Mineika v. UNION NAT'L BANK OF CHICAGO

Citations

  • 332 N.E.2d 504
  • 30 Ill. App. 3d 277
  • 1975 Ill. App. LEXIS 2607

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[u]nder common law, an action in detinue would lie for the recovery of a chattel or its value if the chattel could not be had”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McNAMARA

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.