· 6/19/1975
Mineika v. UNION NAT'L BANK OF CHICAGO
Citations
- 332 N.E.2d 504
- 30 Ill. App. 3d 277
- 1975 Ill. App. LEXIS 2607
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “[u]nder common law, an action in detinue would lie for the recovery of a chattel or its value if the chattel could not be had”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McNAMARA
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.