Skip to main content
· 11/18/1915

Minden v. State

Citations

  • 14 Ala. App. 662

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • permitting admission requests that establish that a “contract says what it says”
  • “If defendant understood the term to have some other possible meaning, it should have specified that meaning and admitted or denied each request based on both meanings.”
  • “Nor is a request objectionable merely because it relates to an ultimate fact or to an issue of fact that is dispositive of one aspect of the case.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pelham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.