Minch Family LLLP v. Buffalo-Red River Watershed District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claims regarding the defendant’s conduct in carrying out a state-court order did not implicate Rook-er-Feldman
• holding that when claims called for “interpretation, not rejection, of the state court’s order,” Rooker-Feldman did not apply
• “In Minnesota, the elements of trespass are a rightful possession in the plaintiff and unlawful entry upon such possession by the defendant.” (quotation omitted)
• ‘Interpretation of court orders presents questions of law’ and ‘as a general rule, when the language is unambiguous, it shall be construed according to its plain meaning.”” (citation and brackets omitted)
• ‘Interpretation of court orders presents questions of law’ and ‘as a general rule, when the language is unambiguous, it shall be construed according to its plain meaning.”” (citation and brackets omitted)
• analyzing Rooker-Feldman in the context of state-court orders

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).