Minasian v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that although a statute allowed the deduction of fines and costs from a defendant’s cash bond, it did not authorize the forfeiture of the bond to pay restitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• Martinez v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2004-05-04· cited 2×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Samuel Friedland Family Ent. v. Amoroso
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1994-01-27· cited 33×
• Amoroso v. SAMUEL FRIEDLAND FAMILY
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-10-14· cited 21×
• Estate of Maltie v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-09-30· cited 14×
• Martin v. Johnson
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1907-06-15· cited 10×
• Accredited Sur. & Cas. Co. v. Hagman
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-04-24· cited 7×
• Southland Ins. Co., Sur. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-11-26· cited 5×