Minard v. Stillman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that district court properly considered whether defendants had sovereign immunity, thus depriving the court of subject matter jurisdiction
• concluding that district court properly considered whether defendants had sovereign immunity, thus depriving the court of subject matter jurisdiction
• holding that the New York Retirement System is an arm of the State
• holding that the New York Retirement System is an arm of the state
• noting that because a retirement system’s operations were statewide in scope, the operations were a function of state government rather than local government
• noting that because a retirement system's operations were statewide in scope, the operations were a function of state government rather than local government

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).