Mims v. State
Citations
- 42 Fla. 199
Syllabus
<p>1. Trial courts, in the exercise of a sound judicial discretion, have power to excuse one summoned as a juror, although he may be qualified to serve, and parties interested object, and appellate courts will not interfere with the action of the trial court in this respect, unless the discretion be abused.</p> <p>2. It is proper to refuse instructions as misleading when they are based on the theory of a party as to facts in evidence and ignore the legal effect of other facts applicable to the relation and rights of the parties.</p> <p>3. Evidence examined and found sufficient to support the verdict.</p>
Judges: Carter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Mathis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-01-15· cited 81×
- Peadon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1903-06-15· cited 26×
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1904-01-15· cited 21×
- West v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1908-01-15· cited 16×
- Sims v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-03-09· cited 15×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Florida Railway & Navigation Co. v. WebsterSupreme Court of Florida· 1889-01-15· cited 56×
- Ellis v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1889-06-15· cited 40×
- John D. C. v. State ex rel. Julia V. H.Supreme Court of Florida· 1878-01-15· cited 38×
- Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1897-06-15· cited 18×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.