Mims v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a mere unverified assertion by a prisoner that he timely gave his Rule 32 petition to prison officials is insufficient to show the date of filing
• holding that a mere unverified assertion by a petitioner that he gave his Rule 32 petition to prison officials for mailing within the two-year limitations period is insufficient to show the date of filing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Allen v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2001-05-25· cited 19×
• Ex Parte Jones
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1998-06-19· cited 15×
• Veteto v. Yocum
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2001-03-02· cited 12×
• Siebert v. Haley
  M.D. Alabama· 2002-03-14· cited 1×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Houston v. Lack
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-24· cited 6,563×
• Carnold v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-02-28· cited 66×
• Boros v. Baxley
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1993-02-26· cited 50×
• Daniels v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1982-06-29· cited 44×
• Holland v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1993-01-22· cited 35×
• Ex Parte Williams
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1992-07-17· cited 34×
• Mims v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1991-05-31· cited 23×
• Maul v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-01-17· cited 7×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1992-07-24· cited 4×