Skip to main content
· 9/28/2005

Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp. v. Black & Decker (N.A.)

Citations

  • 392 F. Supp. 2d 1062
  • 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21613
  • 2005 WL 2403887

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]n patent actions, depositions are customary and are satisfactory as a substitute for technical issues.”
  • “[T]echnological advancements have diminished traditional concerns related to ease of access to sources of proof. . . . documents . . . can be transported . . . in a fast and relatively inexpensive manner.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shabaz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.