Milton v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying pre-ADA Amendments law to determine that plaintiff’s asthma, which she could “mitigate” and did not “consistently restrict[] her ability to breathe,” did not constitute a disability under the ADA
• distinguishing Albert v. Smith’s Food & Drug Ctrs., Inc., 356 F.3d 1242, 1245 (10th Cir. 2004), from Milton to hold that there was no issue of material fact as to whether the plaintiff’s asthma rendered her disabled under the ADA
• Summary judgment may be affirmed “on any grounds supported by the record.”
• ADA Amendments Act is not retroactive
• ADA Amendments Act is not retroactive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).