Milton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant convicted of theft but who was not associated with burglary could not be required to make restitution for any items not included in the information
• holding that defendant convicted of theft but who was not associated with burglary could not be required to make restitution for any items not included in the information

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Chapman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-21· cited 5×
• M.P. v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-03· cited 1×
• MP v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-08-03

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Faulkner v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-07-18· cited 18×
• O'CONNER v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-10-09· cited 4×
• Martel v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-03-11· cited 3×