Milton v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• although the court file was judicially noticed, the trial court erred by permitting use of information contained in that court file where the admission constituted a discovery violation and an inappropriate surprise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Stoll v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2000-04-06· cited 54×
• Allstate Insurance Co. v. Greyhound Rent-A-Car, Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-09-25· cited 5×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Borges v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1982-04-08· cited 116×
• State v. Vazquez
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1982-09-14· cited 72×
• Day v. Sharp
  California Court of Appeal· 1975-08-26· cited 64×
• People v. Rubio
  California Court of Appeal· 1977-07-14· cited 44×
• People v. Freeman
  California Supreme Court· 1978-10-12· cited 39×
• Ferguson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-01-22· cited 15×
• McDaniels v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-08-27· cited 9×
• State v. Dixon
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1966-12-16· cited 8×
• Dowling v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-05-08· cited 7×
• Rodriguez v. Philip
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-05-04· cited 4×