Milton v. Murray

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the sine qua non of de novo review is that the reviewing body possess and exercise the authority to arrive at an independent judgment on the matter in dispute
• holding that the sine qua non of de novo review is that [J-41-2016] - 25 the reviewing body possess and exercise the authority to arrive at an independent judgment on the matter in dispute
• finding no abuse of discretion whenever the putative intervenor would not have presented additional evidence or arguments before the administrative tribunal, and its interests were represented by a party to the proceedings before the tribunal
• finding no abuse of discretion whenever the putative intervenor would not have presented additional evidence or arguments before the administrative tribunal, and its interests were represented by a party to the proceedings before the tribunal
• finding no abuse of discretion whenever the putative intervenor would not have presented additional evidence or arguments before the administrative tribunal, and its interests were represented by a party to the proceedings before the tribunal
• describing “chartering school district” as the district that authorized the charter, as opposed to the other school districts who did not authorize the charter, but, nevertheless, have a financial obligation to the charter school because their students attend the charter school

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).