Skip to main content

Milton v. Milton

Citations

  • 113 So. 3d 1040
  • 2013 WL 2421040
  • 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 8925

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that an appellate court reviews a relocation determination by the trial court for abuse of discretion
  • recognizing that an appellate court reviews a relocation determination by the trial court for abuse of discretion
  • “[T]he question of whether the trial court properly applied the relocation statute is a matter of law, reviewed de novo.”
  • “There is nothing that requires a trial court to hold a person in contempt; the court’s determination in this regard is reviewed for abuse of discretion.”
  • “There is nothing that requires a trial court to hold a person 4 in contempt; the court’s determination in this regard is reviewed for abuse of discretion.”
  • an appellate court “reviews relocation determinations for abuse of discretion; however, the question of whether the trial court properly applied the relocation statute is a matter of law, reviewed de novo”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benton, Clark, Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.