Milot v. Calkins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that where trial court found no mutual understanding because ambiguity in agreement could not be resolved one way or another, our review of trial court’s finding was deferential
• where contract is ambiguous, court can use parol evidence of parties’ understanding of the terms

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).