Skip to main content
· 12/10/1992

Miloslavsky v. AES Engineering Society, Inc.

Citations

  • 808 F. Supp. 351
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19064
  • 1992 WL 372905

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that law enforcement officials have probable cause to arrest if they receive information from persons, normally the putative victims or eyewitnesses, who it seems reasonable to believe are telling the truth
  • determining an adjournment in contemplation of dismissal did not constitute a termination in a complainant’s favor
  • “The veracity of citizen complaints who are the victims of the very crime they report to the police is assumed.”
  • probable cause existed where officer relied on trespassing complaint, positive identification of arrestee as trespasser, and disruptive behavior exhibited by arrestee
  • law enforcement officer is entitled to rely upon information provided by a putative victim or eyewitness who it seems reasonable to believe is telling the truth
  • “[I]t is well-established that a law enforcement official has probable cause to attest if he received his information from some person, normally the putative victim or eyewitness, who it seems reasonable to believe is telling the truth”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sweet

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.