Milos v. Tracy Hall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that section 2-622 did not apply to claim arising from pathologist’s inaccurate preparation of autopsy report
• finding that autopsy was not healing art because intention of procedure was not to restore physical health
• “The nature of the act alleged should determine whether the activity constitutes healing art malpractice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).