Milo John Munson v. Wendell R. Friske, John Rybak, Jr., Kenneth Todd, and Ashland County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiffs claim that he was “virtually unemployable” was undercut by evidence that he was able to secure part-time and then full-time employment after termination by employer
• noting that three years of discovery failed to produce any evidence to support plaintiffs claim
• summary judgment proper only if no reasonable jury could return a verdict for the plaintiff
• summary judgment proper only if no reasonable jury could return a verdict for the plaintiff
• “summary judgment is proper ‘where the plaintiff presents no indication of motive or intent supportive of his position.’ ”
• a liberty interest may be implicated where a government-created stigma forecloses an individual’s freedom to take advantage of other employment opportunities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).