· 10/31/1990
Milo D. Burroughs v. Department of the Army
Citations
- 918 F.2d 170
- 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 18922
- 1990 WL 165235
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “proof of one or more, but not all, of the supporting specifications is sufficient to sustain the charge”
- holding that when more than one specification supports a single charge, proof of one or more, but not all, of the supporting specifications is sufficient to sustain the charge
- holding that when more than one 23 specification supports a single charge, proof of one or more, but not all, of the supporting specifications is sufficient to sustain the charge
- holding that, where more than one event or factual specification supports a single charge, proof of one or more, but not all, of the supporting specifications is sufficient to sustain the charge
- holding that when more than one event or factual specification supports a single charge, proof of one or more, but not all, of the supporting specifications is sufficient to sustain the charge
- holding that, when more than one event or factual specification supports a single charge, proof of one or more, but not all, of the supporting specifications is sufficient to sustain the charge
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nies, Miller, Archer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.