Milo Community Hospital, Etc. v. Caspar W. Weinberger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that no EIS was necessary where \consideration of the factors that the appellant has characterized as 'environmental considerations' could not havechanged the Secretary's decision\
• holding that the Secretary of HEW was not required to file an EIS when decertifying a hospital for non-compliance with safety code because he had a statutory duty to close the hospital and no discretion to take environmental factors into consideration
• finding that no EIS was necessary where “consideration of the factors that the appellant has characterized as ‘environmental considerations’ could not have changed the Secretary's decision”
• no jurisdiction over provider’s claim that its termination from Medicare program violated due process and equal protection clauses; plaintiff failed to seek available administrative remedies
• “Salfi’s restrictions on judicial review to that provided in the Act ‘[are] not made inapplicable by reason of a constitutional challenge, beyond the power of the Secretary to make remedial action.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).