Milner v. Bracken

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that service upon a Canadian resident via FedEx is permissible pursuant to Rule 4(f)(2)(C)(ii) because Canada does not object to Article 10(a) of the Hague Convention
• finding that the signature requirement was satisfied by an email delivery confirmation from FedEx
• finding that the signature requirement was satisfied by an email delivery confirmation from FedEx
• finding that the signature requirement was satisfied by an email delivery confirmation from FedEx
• finding that the signature requirement was satisfied by an email delivery confirmation from FedEx
• noting 22 that “Canada does not object to Article 10(a) of the Convention regarding the use of postal 23 channels”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).