Milmark Services, Inc. v. The United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that decisions within the trial court’s discretion are to be sustained unless “manifestly erroneous”
• holding that decisions within the trial court’s discretion are to be sustained unless “manifestly erroneous”
• holding that decisions that lie within the trial court’s discretion are to be sustained unless “manifestly erroneous”
• holding that decisions within the trial court’s discretion are to be sustained unless “manifestly erroneous”
• affirming a Claims Court decision because the judge “carefully examined all the evidence presented and was unpersuaded, in view of the circumstances of the case, that [the government] had breached such duty”
• “Since the admissibility of expert testimony is within the discretion of the trial judge, this action is to be sustained unless manifestly erroneous.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).