Skip to main content
· 3/17/1960

Millworth Converting Corporation, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Joseph Slifka and Sylvia Slifka, Etc.

Citations

  • 276 F.2d 443
  • 125 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 506
  • 1960 U.S. App. LEXIS 5104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that embroidered reproduction of a public-domain embroidery of Peter Pan was sufficiently distinguishable because the latter gave a “three-dimensional look” to the former embroidery
  • fabric designer required one month of work to give three-dimensional color effect to flat surface
  • fabric designer required one month of work to give three-dimensional color effect to flat surface
  • creation of a three dimensional effect on a flat fabric required effort and skill
  • creation of a three dimensional effect on a flat fabric required effort and skill

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lumbard, Moore, Friendly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.