Skip to main content
· 3/2/1999

Millsap v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 82 Cal. Rptr. 2d 733
  • 70 Cal. App. 4th 196
  • 99 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1562
  • 99 Daily Journal DAR 2005
  • 1999 Cal. App. LEXIS 179

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that there was a “real potential for actual prejudice” if the prosecutors who were the target of the defendant’s alleged murder solicitation were allowed to prosecute his case
  • concluding that there was a \real potential for actual prejudice\ if the prosecutors who were the target of the defendant's alleged murder solicitation were allowed to prosecute his case
  • concluding that there was a “real potential for actual prejudice” if the prosecutors who were the targets of the defendant’s alleged murder solicitation were allowed to prosecute the solicitation case
  • finding the two prosecutors who were targets of the defendant's alleged murder solicitation were not allowed to prosecute the solicitation case, but no conflict of interest justified recusal of the entire prosecutorial office

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Epstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.