Skip to main content
· 3/9/1988

Mills v. White Castle System, Inc

Citations

  • 421 N.W.2d 631
  • 167 Mich. App. 202

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Williams’s policy rationale did not preclude the plaintiff’s negligence claim because the plaintiff argued that the defendant merchant should have summoned the police, not that the defendant should have provided police protection
  • holding that Williams’s policy rationale did not preclude the plaintiffs negligence claim because the plaintiff argued that the defendant merchant should have summoned the police, not that the defendant should have provided police protection
  • reversing the grant of summary disposition in the defendant’s favor when the defendant-merchant was informed of ongoing criminal activity and was asked, but refused, to summon the police

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gillis, Weaver, Allen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.