Mills v. Union Title Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a building that was part of consideration flowing.to vendor was not merely an expectation of an improvement, but a contractual obligation
• finding owner subject to mechanic’s lien because person hiring labor and materials was obligated to make improvements under contract with owner and acted as an agent within the meaning of § 33-981

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).