Mills v. Union Security Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiff required to personally serve school district where the petition “failed to set forth any claim that the District had waived personal service”
• “[T]hough the SRO, in its discretion, might consider whether a party has suffered prejudice, the regulations require a showing of good cause to excuse untimeliness – and here, Plaintiff provided none.”
• “The ‘arbitrary and capricious’ inquiry requires the Court to determine whether the SRO’s decision was supported by a consideration of the relevant factors and whether a clear error of judgment occurred.”
• “Courts in this Circuit have held that—absent good cause shown—a party who fails to make a timely appeal to the SRO, or fails to timely serve the respondent, has failed to satisfy the exhaustion requirement.” (collecting cases)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).