Mills v. Sherman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Decided before the statute was enacted. The plaintiff could call witnesses on rebuttal even though the plaintiff had known the witnesses existed before trial and had considered calling them in the case-in-chief.
• Decided before the statute was enacted. The plaintiff could call witnesses on rebuttal even though the plaintiff had known the witnesses existed before trial and had considered calling them in the case-in-chief.
• Decided before the statute was enacted. The plaintiff could call witnesses on rebuttal even though the plaintiff had known the witnesses existed before trial and had considered calling them in the case-in-chief.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).