Mills v. Mills

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the dismissal of the ex-spouse’s motion seeking alimony because the “critical issue” before the court “was precisely the same issue” previously adjudicated and was essential to the previous judgment
• legal and factual determination ex-spouse was not contractually entitled to alimony expressly decided in prior summary judgment and thus barred by collateral estoppel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Kane v. Town of Harpswell (In Re Kane)
  First Circuit· 2001-06-22· cited 47×
• Efstathiou v. Efstathiou
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2009-10-27· cited 32×
• Jamie D. Pacheco v. Libby O'Brien Kingsley & Champion, LLC
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2022-12-29· cited 8×

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cianchette v. Verrier
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1959-05-08· cited 26×
• Raymond v. Raymond
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1982-07-06· cited 7×