Mills v. Mills

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \noncompliance with Rule 65.03 is sufficient by itself to uphold the trial court's denial of a continuance\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bydalek v. Brines
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-10-27· cited 30×
• Midwestern Health Management, Inc. v. Walker
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-12-12· cited 28×
• Central America Health Sciences University, Belize Medical College v. Norouzian
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2007-09-11· cited 18×
• McCubbin v. Taylor
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-11-16· cited 15×
• Portwood-Hurt v. Hurt
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-03-31· cited 11×
• State of Washington Ex Rel. Lewis v. Collis
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1998-02-10· cited 9×
• Couch v. Couch
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1998-11-03· cited 8×
• Kamler v. Kamler
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2007-01-30· cited 7×
• Robinson v. Robinson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2003-12-23· cited 5×
• Meadows v. Meadows
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2011-01-11· cited 5×
• Bullard v. Bullard
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2000-05-16· cited 5×
• T.L.D. v. A.L.P.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2011-08-16· cited 5×
• Manns v. Chapman
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1999-03-09· cited 3×
• Laseter v. Griffin
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1998-05-14· cited 1×
• In Re RAD Ex Rel. TLD
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2011-08-16
• Laura Collins v. Melvin Collins
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2019-06-04