Mills v. McMillan
Citations
- 78 Fla. 294
- 82 So. 812
Syllabus
<p>1. A necessary element in notation, where there is a substitution of a new debtor, is the extinguishment 'of the original debt and the complete release of the debtor.</p> <p>2. In pleading discharge or release from an obligation by novation the plea should definitely aver the extinguishment of -the original debt as the Consideration for the promise of the new debtor, or such must be the necessary inference from the facts averred.</p> <p>3. Novation is not presumed from an assignment of a contract which carries an obligation to pay money.</p> <p>4. One of the essentials 'of novation is that the promise of the new debtor must be valid.</p>
Judges: Browne, Ellis, Taylor, West
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Palmetto Mfg. Co. v. Parker & AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia· 1905-08-04· cited 27×
- Kelso v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court· 1885-12-11· cited 25×
- Armstrong v. WalkerSupreme Court of Alabama· 1917-05-17· cited 19×
- Parker v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1870-09-15· cited 19×
- Hopkins v. JordanSupreme Court of Alabama· 1918-01-24· cited 17×
- Adams v. PowerMississippi Supreme Court· 1873-04-15· cited 14×
- Stowell v. GramMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1904-01-06· cited 12×
- Wierman v. Bay City-Michigan Sugar Co.Michigan Supreme Court· 1905-12-30· cited 12×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.