Skip to main content
· 7/24/1944

Millis v. Inland Empire District Council

Citations

  • 144 F.2d 539
  • 79 U.S. App. D.C. 214
  • 14 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 872
  • 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 2878

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that city had waived any objection that plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies with regard to Title VII failure to promote claim
  • holding that failure to exhaust administrative remedies is a waivable prerequisite to bringing a Title VII claim in federal court, rather than a jurisdictional requirement
  • holding that exhaustion of administrative remedies is not a “jurisdictional prerequisite” to a Title VII claim
  • stating that administrative exhaustion is not a jurisdictional prerequisite for Title VII and ADA claims, but it is a precondition to bringing suit
  • stating that administrative exhaustion is not a jurisdictional prerequisite for Title VII and ADA claims, but it is a precondition to bringing suit
  • stating that administrative exhaustion in the ADA context “is not a jurisdictional [prerequisite], but only a precondition to bringing [suit] ... that can be waived by the parties or the court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edgerton, Groner, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.