· 7/24/1944
Millis v. Inland Empire District Council
Citations
- 144 F.2d 539
- 79 U.S. App. D.C. 214
- 14 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 872
- 1944 U.S. App. LEXIS 2878
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that city had waived any objection that plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies with regard to Title VII failure to promote claim
- holding that failure to exhaust administrative remedies is a waivable prerequisite to bringing a Title VII claim in federal court, rather than a jurisdictional requirement
- holding that exhaustion of administrative remedies is not a “jurisdictional prerequisite” to a Title VII claim
- stating that administrative exhaustion is not a jurisdictional prerequisite for Title VII and ADA claims, but it is a precondition to bringing suit
- stating that administrative exhaustion is not a jurisdictional prerequisite for Title VII and ADA claims, but it is a precondition to bringing suit
- stating that administrative exhaustion in the ADA context “is not a jurisdictional [prerequisite], but only a precondition to bringing [suit] ... that can be waived by the parties or the court”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edgerton, Groner, Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.