Milliner v. Enck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statements made to unemployment compensation representative were absolutely privileged from liability for defamation
• explaining that “if appellant felt aggrieved by appellees’ [judicially privileged] statements, it could have” challenged the statements in the underlying unemployment compensation proceeding
• explaining Pennsylvania case law has attached absolute privilege to proceedings that are judicial or quasi-judicial in character
• “It is clear that an allegedly defamatory communication is absolutely privileged when it is published prior to a judicial proceeding as long as that communication has a bearing on the subject matter of the litigation.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).