Milline v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “in assessing the constitutionality of an investigatory stop, a court’s determination of the existence of reasonable suspicion ‘cannot be a mere ratification of the conclusions of others’” (quoting Gates, 462 U.S. at 239)
• stop would have been improper \if we had nothing but the officers' testimony that Milline matched a now-forgotten description in [the radio] lookout\
• appellant would be entitled to relief if he was correct that the trial court “could [not] assess the sufficiency of the description to justify a stop of anyone ” in the group described (italics in original)
• appellant would be entitled to relief if he was correct that the trial court \could [not] assess the sufficiency of the description to justify a stop of anyone \ in the group described (italics in original)
• ‘‘Given (1) the exactitude with which the lookout specified the subjects' location, (2) the proximity in time between the lookout and the stop, (3) the particularity -and unquestioned accuracy of the, description of Hawkins, (4) Milline’s association on the scene with Hawkins, (5

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).