Milliken v. Barr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that a claim that “enhanced mandatory minimum sentences authorized by the [J-31-2022] - 11 statute are unconstitutional when based on a refusal to submit to a warrantless blood test” constitutes a challenge to the legality of the sentence
• \Birchfield contemplated that the decision would apply not only to separate criminal offenses but also to enhanced sentencing . . . that might arise from refusal.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).