Michigan Court of Appeals· 12/29/1992
Milligan v. Milligan
Citations
- 496 N.W.2d 394
- 197 Mich. App. 665
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because the plaintiffs did not challenge the hourly rate or the amount of time expended before the trial court, the issue regarding actual costs was not preserved for appellate review.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fitzgerald, Holbrook, Corrigan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Beason v. BeasonMichigan Supreme Court· 1990-09-11· cited 174×
- Thames v. ThamesMichigan Court of Appeals· 1991-09-16· cited 73×
- Mead v. BatchlorMichigan Supreme Court· 1990-08-28· cited 53×
- People v. StacyMichigan Court of Appeals· 1992-02-03· cited 39×
- Stackhouse v. StackhouseMichigan Court of Appeals· 1992-04-06· cited 39×
- Thompson v. MerrittMichigan Court of Appeals· 1991-12-30· cited 30×
- Mauro v. MauroMichigan Court of Appeals· 1992-09-08· cited 16×
- Tomblinson v. TomblinsonMichigan Court of Appeals· 1990-05-07· cited 13×
- Demman v. DemmanMichigan Court of Appeals· 1992-07-20· cited 11×
- Landry v. RoebuckMichigan Court of Appeals· 1992-04-06· cited 8×
- Langford v. LangfordMichigan Court of Appeals· 1992-10-19· cited 7×
- Helm v. HelmMichigan Court of Appeals· 1969-04-23· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.