Skip to main content
· 11/1/2011

Milligan v. Archuleta

Citations

  • 659 F.3d 1294
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 22051
  • 2011 WL 5148966

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that fact that plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to employment would bar him from succeeding on a procedural due process claim, but it does not foreclose his retaliation claim
  • finding plaintiff could state a retaliation claim arising from the loss of his prison job

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Brien, McKay, Tymkovich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.