· 11/1/2011
Milligan v. Archuleta
Citations
- 659 F.3d 1294
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 22051
- 2011 WL 5148966
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that fact that plaintiff does not have a constitutional right to employment would bar him from succeeding on a procedural due process claim, but it does not foreclose his retaliation claim
- finding plaintiff could state a retaliation claim arising from the loss of his prison job
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Brien, McKay, Tymkovich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.