Skip to main content
· 5/12/1994

Millett v. Union Oil Co. of California

Citations

  • 24 F.3d 10
  • 1994 WL 178323

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[w]hen a party has filed a timely motion to alter or amend a judgment after a notice of appeal has been filed, the district court still retains jurisdiction to consider the motion.”
  • “When a party has filed a timely motion to alter or amend a judgment after a notice of appeal has been filed, the district court still retains jurisdiction to consider the motion.”
  • “Waiver requires more than an awareness of a breach.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hall, Hug, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.