Millet v. Inhabitants of Stoneham

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• precluding relitigation of personal jurisdiction issue and rejecting contention that jurisdictional facts had changed because party opposing preclusion offered no proof of change
• precluding relitigation of personal jurisdiction issue and rejecting contention that jurisdictional facts had changed because party opposing preclusion offered no proof of change
• characterizing ―personal jurisdiction‖ as ―the issue that was fully litigated in the previous action‖
• characterizing “personal jurisdiction” as “the issue that was fully litigated in the previous action”
• placing burden on party opposing preclusion
• placing burden on party opposing preclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).