Millers Casualty Insurance Co. of Texas v. Briggs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• suggesting that such exclusions prevent \dual recovery\ that \would transform underinsured motorist coverage into liability insurance\
• concluding the state legislature “recognized that a court 9 must weigh the public interest in prohibiting anticompetitive conduct against the 10 recognition that businesses need some latitude within which to conduct their trade”
• upholding exclusion from UIM coverage vehicles insured under the policy that are operated or occupied by an insured at the time of the accident
• upholding exclusion from UIM coverage vehicles insured under the policy that are operated or occupied by an insured at the time of the accident
• all approving of the insured car exclusion to prevent stacking of uninsured or underinsured coverages on top of liability coverage
• “The result of dual recovery in the instant case would transform underinsured motorist coverage into liability insurance”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).