Miller v. Whittier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the July suspension did not qualify as an adverse action because Plaintiff failed to show objectively tangible harm
• holding that Plaintiff’s retaliation claim failed as a matter of law because there was no dispute that the suspension occurred before the alleged protected activity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).