Miller v. U.S. Department of the Interior

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to apply the continuing harm doctrine in a federal debt collection case, holding that the \statute of limitations is not reset by each communication where ... the subsequent communications are continued efforts to collect the same debt[.]\
• “Arguments raised for the first time in reply generally should not be considered without affording the opposing party an opportunity to respond.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).