Skip to main content
· 10/5/2009

Miller v. Upton, Cohen & Slamowitz

Citations

  • 687 F. Supp. 2d 86
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92414
  • 2009 WL 3212556

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Even prior review of an individual debtor’s file by another, including co-counsel, is not substitute for an independent review by the attorney signing and issuing [a communication].”
  • “[T]he information actually conveyed to UCS consisted principally of [plaintiff’s] basic identifying information . . . all of which corresponded to the NAN software’s preset data fields.”
  • referred to herein as “Miller III”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mauskopf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.