· 10/5/2009
Miller v. Upton, Cohen & Slamowitz
Citations
- 687 F. Supp. 2d 86
- 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92414
- 2009 WL 3212556
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Even prior review of an individual debtor’s file by another, including co-counsel, is not substitute for an independent review by the attorney signing and issuing [a communication].”
- “[T]he information actually conveyed to UCS consisted principally of [plaintiff’s] basic identifying information . . . all of which corresponded to the NAN software’s preset data fields.”
- referred to herein as “Miller III”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mauskopf
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.